Home   News   National   Article

Family of Sheku Bayoh reach out-of-court settlement with Police Scotland


By PA News



The family of Sheku Bayoh have reached an out-of-court settlement with Police Scotland after moving to sue the force following his death.

Mr Bayoh, 31, died in Kirkcaldy, Fife on May 3, 2015, after he was restrained on the ground by six police officers.

His family raised a civil action against Police Scotland three years later.

A public inquiry has also been examining the circumstances leading to Mr Bayoh’s death, the investigation into his death and whether or not race was a factor.

Police Scotland Chief Constable Jo Farrell met with Mr Bayoh’s family last month and offered an apology to them for their ordeal.

Sheku Bayoh’s sister Kadi Johnson (left) and solicitor Aamer Anwar speak outside the inquiry building (Jane Barlow/PA)
Sheku Bayoh’s sister Kadi Johnson (left) and solicitor Aamer Anwar speak outside the inquiry building (Jane Barlow/PA)

A joint statement from Police Scotland and solicitor Aamer Anwar, who has been representing the family, said on Monday a settlement has now been agreed without any admission of liability by the force.

The statement said that to “respect the privacy of the family, the details of the agreement will remain confidential”.

Mr Anwar said: “On the 3rd of May it will be the 10th anniversary of Sheku’s death in police custody, however the struggle for the truth continues.

“As we reach the final stages of the public inquiry, those who broke the law should remember there is no time limit on justice. There will be no further comment today.”

A spokesperson for the Scottish Police Federation said the organisation, which represents rank-and-file officers, was “surprised to find that the chief constable has decided to settle this claim”.

The spokesperson said: “As the inquiry continues, it would be inappropriate to say any more at this stage, other than to remind the public that the clear position of the officers involved in the apprehension of Mr Bayoh is that they acted reasonably, in the public interest in the circumstances, given the danger that he presented.”

Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More